The threat of cyberattacks against law firms, businesses, and lawyers is constantly growing. The legal sector stores lots of private information, including client records, financial data, and intellectual property. Due to the high value of this information to cybercriminals, law firms have become frequent targets of cyberattacks. As reported by the ABA, nearly 25% of large law firms (those with 100 lawyers or more) have suffered a data breach, which is on the rise (American Bar Association, 2018).
There have been several high-profile cyberattacks on legal firms in recent years. The international law firm DLA Piper was the target of a ransomware attack in 2017, severely disrupting the law firm’s operations worldwide (TitanFile, 2017). Ransomware was used to steal confidential client information from the prestigious law firm Grubman Shire Meiselas and Sacksinthe in 2020 (CNN, 2020). Law firms have lost money because of these attacks, and their reputations and clients’ trust have also been harmed.
This article explores the potential of decentralized storage to protect law firms and legal practitioners against cyberattacks. Decentralized storage systems distribute data across several nodes in a network, reducing the risk of a single location or point of failure or attack. The article will overview decentralized storage, its advantages and disadvantages, and how it can enhance security, privacy, scalability, and accessibility for legal professionals. Additionally, the article will discuss the challenges and potential solutions to integrating decentralized storage into law firm workflows and the wider legal industry.
Decentralized storage is a distributed data storage system that stores and manages data through a network of nodes rather than relying on a centralized server or data center. Data is divided into multiple segments, encrypted, and distributed across network nodes, making it difficult for attackers to compromise the entire system (Huang Z et al., 2016).
Peer-to-peer (P2P) architecture is commonly used in decentralized storage systems, in which each node in the network contributes storage space and bandwidth to other nodes in the system. Nodes can join and leave the network on the fly, and the system can adjust data allocation among nodes on the fly to ensure high availability and fault tolerance (Maftei et al., 2023).
Decentralized storage has several advantages over centralized storage solutions.
Firstly, it improves security by lowering the likelihood of a single point of failure or attack. In a cloud storage scenario, all data is stored in centralized storage systems on a single server or data center, making it vulnerable to cyberattacks or physical disasters. Decentralized storage, on the other hand, distributes data across multiple computers or nodes, making it more difficult for attackers to compromise the entire system.
Secondly, decentralized storage offers greater privacy and data sovereignty. Unauthorized parties find accessing or stealing data more difficult because it is encrypted and distributed across several nodes. Furthermore, because the data is stored on a P2P network, no centralized authority can control or access the data, enhancing data sovereignty and autonomy for users (Hoang et al., 2020).
However, data access and transfer speeds can be affected by the number of nodes, their bandwidth, and, thus, the system’s scalability.
Legal and regulatory hurdles exist because no authority governs and regulates the system. Decentralized storage systems must be constructed to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, and data must be stored and managed by following legal and ethical standards (Sharma et al., 2021).
detect and respond to potential security threats. According to (Buffer, 2020), over 70% of remote workers in the private sector in the US use personal devices for work, increasing the risk of malware and unauthorized access. Additionally, remote workers frequently use public Wi-Fi networks, which could be more secure. IT teams can implement strong access controls, multifactor authentication, and encryption measures and educate remote workers about secure network use, including VPNs.
While decentralized storage offers increased security and privacy, it has challenges. Because the data is dispersed across multiple nodes, recovering it may be more challenging if it is accidentally deleted (Maftei et al., 2023). Second, there is the potential for decentralized storage systems to have performance and scalability issues.
The number of nodes and their bandwidths determine the system’s performance and capacity. The network’s latency and speed may increase as new users and nodes are added. The lack of a governing body or authority can make it difficult to grow and regulate the system (Sharma et al., 2021).
The potential insecurity of decentralized storage is yet another issue. Because of the system’s decentralized nature, it can be challenging to ensure its complete security due to the wide variety of nodes that make up the network, each of which has its security protocols and vulnerabilities. In addition, given the relative youth of the technology, vulnerabilities in the decentralized storage system may exist that attackers still need to discover (Hoang et al., 2020).
Finally, legal and regulatory hurdles can make implementing decentralized storage of customer data in a legitimate business setting difficult. Lawyers and law firms have a professional and ethical obligation to safeguard client information, and doing so may be impossible if the data is stored on a distributed ledger. Law firms may also need to maintain centralized control over their data to ensure compliance with legal frameworks like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (American Bar Association, 2018).
For lawyers and law firms, decentralized storage can increase scalability and accessibility. Decentralized storage systems can offer more storage space and bandwidth than conventional centralized storage systems because the data is spread across multiple network nodes.
Decentralized storage systems’ P2P architecture also enables nodes to join and leave the network dynamically, allowing the system to adjust data allocation among the nodes in real time, increasing availability and fault tolerance while enhancing scalability and user accessibility (Maftei et al., 2023).
By offering a more flexible and adaptable storage solution, decentralized storage can also increase accessibility for legal professionals. Accessing data through a central server or data center is frequently required by traditional centralized storage systems, which can cause latency and accessibility problems.
The efficiency and productivity of legal professionals, especially those who work remotely or frequently travel, are improved by decentralized storage, which allows users to access data from any node in the network and makes it simpler to access and share data across multiple locations or even mobile devices (Huang et al., 2016).
Decentralized storage has the potential to lower costs and increase scalability and accessibility, but there are also drawbacks and difficulties in its adoption.
First of all, decentralized storage technologies are still a fairly recent development. Integrating decentralized storage into current systems, workflows, software systems, and applications that many organizations, law firms, and other legal professionals frequently use can be challenging.
In addition, there might be a need for education and training to ensure that lawyers know how to use decentralized storage effectively (Sharma et al., 2021). Decentralized storage systems could result in increased complexity and maintenance expenses.
Decentralized storage relies on a distributed network of nodes, so managing and maintaining the network’s nodes may incur additional management and support costs. Additionally, there needs to be a centralized authority to make it easier to analyze and fix problems that develop in the system (Maftei et al., 2023).
Finally, implementing decentralized storage in a legal context may present legal and regulatory challenges. For instance, the GDPR mandates that organizations process personal data legitimately, equitably, and transparently. Meeting these requirements may be more difficult with decentralized storage, especially if no central authority or organization supervises and controls data processing (American Bar Association, 2018).
Legal professionals should think about the legal and ethical ramifications of using decentralized storage in a legal context. First and foremost, legal professionals must safeguard sensitive client information and ensure it is handled morally and legally. Meeting these requirements could be easier if decentralized storage is used, especially if there is no central authority to oversee and control data processing. Decentralized storage’s distributed nature may also make tracking and monitoring data access and use harder, creating risks for law and morality (Hoang et al., 2020).
Second, there may be moral issues with who owns and controls the data when using decentralized storage. By allowing clients to retain ownership and control over their data, decentralized storage helps legal professionals fulfill their ethical obligation to keep customer trust and protect their client’s privacy. However, there may be moral issues with storing and sharing sensitive data on P2P networks, especially if no governing body or government monitors and regulates data processing (Sharma et al., 2021).
In a legal context, using decentralized storage raises several regulatory compliance and governance issues. For instance, the GDPR mandates that organizations process personal data legitimately, equitably, and transparently. Meeting these requirements could be easier if decentralized storage is used, especially if there is no central authority to oversee and control data processing. Data sovereignty and protection issues may also arise, especially if data is kept in multiple jurisdictions (American Bar Association, 2018). Decentralized storage raises the possibility of increased data management and regulation complexity, which is another regulatory concern.
Decentralized storage systems rely on a distributed network of nodes, which makes it more difficult to track and monitor data access and use.
Furthermore, the absence of a centralized authority can make it challenging to enforce laws and regulations about data processing (Huang et al., 2016).
Finally, using decentralized storage in a legal context may present governance difficulties. Legal experts make sure that private client information is processed and stored securely. It might be more difficult to meet these requirements because of the distributed nature of decentralized storage. Incorporating decentralized storage into current processes and systems may present additional difficulties affecting governance and operational issues (Maftei et al., 2023). As a result, it is crucial to carefully weigh the advantages and disadvantages of using decentralized storage in a legal context. Additionally, legal professionals should look into ways to address these issues and ensure that any decentralized storage solution meets their unique needs.
Law firms and professionals have successfully implemented and used decentralized storage systems, although it is still relatively new. A blockchain-based storage system, for instance, was used by the law firm Hogan Lovells to store and share sensitive client data securely. The system allows the company to distribute and encrypt the data across numerous network nodes, making it highly secure and more challenging for attackers to compromise the data. Additionally, the system offers clients improved data privacy and sovereignty ( Marathe, 2022).
Another example is the legal tech company Skiff, which uses a decentralized storage system to store and manage legal documents and evidence. It is now simpler for legal professionals to collaborate and work remotely, thanks to the system’s ability to access and share data from anywhere in the world. To further guarantee that only authorized users can access the data, the system offers a private key and strong encryption keys, and access control mechanisms (Skiff, 2021)
Although there are not many examples of law firms or attorneys using decentralized storage, there are a few best practices and lessons learned that can be applied to introducing such technologies. Identifying the organization’s needs and requirements before deciding on a decentralized storage solution. Data security, privacy, availability, and regulatory compliance are all important criteria for firms and lawyers when deciding on a system ( Marathe, 2022).
Companies should consider investing in a comprehensive program to ensure their legal team members have the necessary training and support to use decentralized storage effectively, resulting in providing initial and ongoing training on decentralized storage and contingency or maintenance plans. Legal professionals should also be aware of the risks associated with using these systems—for example, data loss, scaling issues, and compliance risks—and how they may affect outcomes in a given case or practice. They should carefully consider whether they must invest in additional tools to optimize workflow or streamline processes.
Companies that implement decentralized storage must consider whether it suits existing workflows. They will face challenges, including governance builds trust issues, cybersecurity concerns, and a lack of transparency about data access rights when integrating this technology into existing systems (Sharma et al., 2021).
Also, organizations usually implement multiple cases for storing their files, making it hard for SaaS providers to choose which cases are most efficient and suitable for them to develop products. The best practice is that each organization has a more tailored strategy to its requirements.
Several decentralized and decentralized data storage trends are emerging and will soon affect the legal profession.
One trend is that people are moving towards decentralized storage systems based on blockchain networks, which provide increased security measures and privacy protection against cybercrime. These can help safeguard sensitive client data with any providers or employees working remotely and keep data from different locations without needing a single authority to control who has access to the data.
Another trend is using these systems for cross-jurisdictional collaboration and storing data efficiently outside one’s own country’s borders, helping to meet compliance requirements in foreign countries when using cloud services. Trends like these mean that firms must invest in decentralized storage solutions sooner rather than later or risk becoming obsolete due to outdated infrastructure (Zahra et al., 2020).
Challenges in decentralized file storage systems, such as security and regulatory compliance, hinder their adoption for use in legal settings. For example, there are no industry standards for encrypted communication or protecting data integrity between decentralized storage systems; firms can only communicate with multiple providers with this standardization. Further, existing rules on encryption methods for handling sensitive information may conflict with the architecture of distributed storage systems (Posey, 2021).
While some lawyers have already begun experimenting with the technology, challenges such as regulatory and privacy barriers prevent widespread adoption of the new system. These challenges arise because there need to be encryption or integrity standards among decentralized storage platforms and because the architectures of these decentralized platforms often differ from those typically encountered by law firms (Zahra et al., 2020).
Finally, blockchain-based distributed storage networks present various challenges and obstacles to legal professionals considering their use. These may include scalability issues, maintenance and support concerns, data recovery issues in network failure cases, and infrastructure investment costs. Decentralized storage systems also force companies to alter previous procedures for incorporating and managing data within the company structure. Legal professionals must carefully assess their needs and requirements before implementing such a system for it to be successful.
Decentralized storage has all the features needed to protect law firms from cyberattacks. Unlike traditional centralized storage, decentralized storage does not have a single point of failure that cybercriminals can exploit. It is also more secure and private than traditional storage, allowing clients to reap its benefits and their lawyers in legal practice areas such as intellectual property and electronic discovery. The availability of decentralized cloud storage means companies can use them on or off-premise for disaster recovery. Decentralized cloud providers typically operate using a P2P network accessed through the internet, which is one reason it is faster than traditional cloud providers. This speed is particularly important for businesses in industries like financial services or health care, which require compliance with industry regulations because it allows law firms to store critical data and retrieve it quickly when regulatory changes occur. Decentralized storage systems allow retaining control of data across multiple servers so that no one company or person has full control or access to it.
A decentralized storage setting can improve legal processes regardless of size or industry. When working on sensitive documents, legal professionals need to be able to store and share data quickly and securely while ensuring that files are not compromised. Decentralized storage promises to make this happen, but it could be expensive and challenging. Legal professionals must work with technology experts and vendors across the spectrum to ensure success when implementing decentralized storage as they craft their policies and procedures.
References:
American Bar Association. (2018). 2018 ABA Legal Technology Survey Report. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/products/ecd/ebk/347161404/
TitanFile. (2017). DLA Piper Ransomware Hack: What Can We Learn From It? Retrieved from https://www.titanfile.com/blog/dla-piper-ransomware-hack-can-learn
CNN. (2020). Hackers demand ransom from A-list law firms. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/videos/tv/2020/05/16/hackers-hit-a-list-law-firm-claim-to-have-info-on-trump.cnn
Maftei, A.A.; Lavric, A.; Petrariu, A.I.; Popa, V. Massive Data Storage Solution for IoT Devices Using Blockchain Technologies. Sensors 2023, 23, 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031570
Hoang, V.H.; Lehtihet, E.; Ghamri-Doudane, Y. (2019). Privacy-Preserving Blockchain-Based Data Sharing Platform for Decentralized Storage Systems. IEEE IFIP Networking Conference, 2020 IFIP Networking Conference (Networking), pp. 280-288, 2020.
Huang Z, Ayday E, Lin H, Aiyar RS, Molyneaux A, Xu Z, Fellay J, Steinmetz LM, Hubaux JP. A privacy-preserving solution for compressed storage and selective retrieval of genomic data. Genome Res. 2016 Dec;26(12):1687-1696
Sharma, P.; Jindal, R.; Borah, M.D. (2021) Blockchain-based decentralized architecture for a cloud storage system, Journal of Information Security and Applications, 2, 10297
Skiff. (2021). Skiff Integrates IPFS to Bring Decentralization and Encryption to Consumers, Retrieved from https://blog.ipfs.tech/2021-11-15-Skiff-Integrates-IPFS/
Marathe, I. (2022). Hogan Lovells Launches Blockchain-Powered ‘DriveChain’ in Hopes to Expedite Document Management. Retrieved from
Brien Posey (2021). Decentralized cloud storage: What you need to know. Retrieved from https://www.techtarget.com/searchstorage/tip/Decentralized-cloud-storage-What-you-need-to-know
Physical Address (Head Office)
ECCENSCIA LLC
Sharjah Media City
Sharjah
UAE
Formation No: 2115999
Email
info@eccenscia.com
